สืบค้นงานวิจัย
Mechanised Agronomic Practices in Rubber Plantations – Indian Scenario
Phebe Joseph - ไม่ระบุหน่วยงาน
ชื่อเรื่อง (EN): Mechanised Agronomic Practices in Rubber Plantations – Indian Scenario
ผู้แต่ง / หัวหน้าโครงการ (EN): Phebe Joseph
บทคัดย่อ (EN): Adoption of mechanisation in agricultural operations has led to significant improvement in agricultural productivity and sustainability. The impacts of mechanized land preparation on soil properties and mechanised weed control on regeneration of weeds in rubber plantations were examined in field experiments. The land preparation methods evaluated were (a) pitting, terracing and tilling inter rows by Hitachi (b) pitting and terracing by Hitachi (c) pitting by tractor mounded hole digger and manual terracing and (d) Standard practice - manual pitting and terracing. The trial was laid out in a randomised block design with 4 replications. Soil samples were collected from the inter row area of individual plots to determine the mechanical properties, bulk density, porosity and soil organic carbon content before and after the treatment imposition. The results of the study indicated that pitting, terracing and tilling inter rows by Hitachi lead to significantly higher porosity, lower bulk density and soil organic carbon compared to untilled treatments. The rate of soil erosion in pitting, terracing and tilling inter rows by Hitachi was 28 per cent more than the no tilled treatments. Comparative cost analysis revealed that pitting and terracing by Hitachi saves around 50 per cent of cost of cultivation compared to the standard method (manual) of land preparation. In the evaluation of weed control methods, the treatments included were slashing of weeds with sickle (manual weeding), spraying of herbicide (glyphosate 2L/ha) and mechanical weeding by weed cutters. The results showed that weed control was most effective in herbicide applied plots and regeneration of weeds occurred only 60 days after treatment imposition. In manual and mechanical weed control methods, the weeds attained 100 percent of regeneration 75 and 90 days after treatment imposition, respectively. The economics of different weed control methods showed that the weeding cost can be reduced by 65 and 75 percent by chemical and mechanical weed control methods compared to manual method.
บทคัดย่อ: ไม่พบข้อมูลจากหน่วยงานต้นทาง
ภาษา (EN): en
เผยแพร่โดย (EN): การยางแห่งประเทศไทย
คำสำคัญ (EN): weed control
เจ้าของลิขสิทธิ์ (EN): การยางแห่งประเทศไทย
หากไม่พบเอกสารฉบับเต็ม (Full Text) โปรดติดต่อหน่วยงานเจ้าของข้อมูล

การอ้างอิง

Phebe Joseph. "Mechanised Agronomic Practices in Rubber Plantations – Indian Scenario". ไม่ระบุหน่วยงาน. ม.ป.ป.

Phebe Joseph. "Mechanised Agronomic Practices in Rubber Plantations – Indian Scenario". ไม่ระบุหน่วยงาน. ม.ป.ป.. Print.



TARR Wordcloud:
Mechanised Agronomic Practices in Rubber Plantations – Indian Scenario
Phebe Joseph
การยางแห่งประเทศไทย
ไม่ระบุวันที่เผยแพร่
Carbon and Nutrients stock in mature rubber plantations with and without control of under flora Expansion of rubber plantations as an environment factor to increase malaria risk at the Thai borders Windfarm Cultural Practices for Rubber Plantations in China Labour used in rubber plantations and labour movement in rural, sub-urban and urban communities: A case study in Songkhla Province, Southern Thailand The Role of Myanmar Rubber Planters and Producers Association (MRPPA) in Natural Rubber Development and its Recent Activities Effect of Temperature Constraints on Photosynthesis of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) DISEASES OF RUBBER (Hevea brasiliensis) IN THE PHILIPPINES, CONTROL AND SCREENING FOR RESISTANCE FEASIBILITY OF RUBBER (Hevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg.) CULTIVATION IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE OF SRI LANKA; A NON TRADITIONAL AREA FOR RUBBER Development of Rubber Plantations in Nigeria Rubber Particles Proteins and Sensitivity to the Tapping Panel Dryness at Hevea brasiliensis
คัดลอก URL
กระทู้ของฉัน
ผลการสืบค้นทั้งหมด โพสต์     เรียงลำดับจาก
พัฒนาระบบโดยศูนย์ความรู้เฉพาะด้านวิศวกรรมความรู้และวิศวกรรมภาษาDeveloped by Center of Excellence for Unified Knowledge and Language Engineering
สนับสนุนโดยสำนักงานพัฒนาการวิจัยการเกษตร (องค์การมหาชน)Supported by the Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization)
แบบสำรวจความพึงพอใจQuestionair