คลังข้อมูลการวิจัยการเกษตรไทย

ผู้แต่ง Boonyuan

เผยแพร่โดย

1 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 2 Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, Kasetsart University Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 3 Ministry of Public Health, National Institute of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand 4 Department of Pest Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5 Department of Plant Science and Agricultural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand 6 Division of Computer and Statistics, Faculty of Liberal Art and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaensean, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand 7 Public Health & Malaria Control Department, PT Freeport Indonesia, International SOS, Jl. Kertajasa Kuala Kencana, Papua 99920, Indonesia 8 Corresponding author, e-mail: faasthc@ku.ac.th

เผยแพร่เมื่อ ไม่ระบุวันที่เผยแพร่

หน่วยงาน ไม่ระบุหน่วยงาน

งานวิจัยที่แนะนำ Comparative effectiveness of monomolecular surface film on Aedes aegypti (L.) and Anopheles minimus (Theobald) (Diptera: Culicidae) จีโนมของไวรัสซิกาที่ติดเชื้อในยุงรำคาญจากการเพาะเลี้ยงในห้องปฏิบัติการโดย Next-generation sequencing Complete genome sequences of Zika virus from infected laboratory strains of Culex quinquefasciatus Optimal Discriminating Concentrations of Six Synthetic Pyrethroids for Monitoring Insecticide Susceptibility in Anopheles minimus (Diptera: Culicidae), a Primary Malaria Vector in Thailand Development of larvicidal Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis by the Thai NIH and its comparison to Bacillus sphaericus and temephos in a selection experiment with the mosquito Culex quinquefascia Molecular analysis of Culex quinquefasciatus larvae responses to Lysinibacillus sphaericus bin toxin Species diversity and abundance of Tabanus spp. (Diptera: Tabanidae) in different habitats of Thailand Salivary gland proteome during adult development and after blood feeding of female Anopheles dissidens mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) Evidence to support a conspecific nature of allopatric cytological races of Anopheles nitidus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand Cytogenetic, cross-mating and molecular evidence of four cytological races of Anopheles crawfordi (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Cambodia Synergistic effect of combination deltamethrin and piperonyl butoxide on behavioral avoidance and mortality responses of Aedes aegypti L.

คัดลอก URL

ชื่อเรื่อง (EN):	Insecticidal and Behavioral Avoidance Responses of Anopheles minimus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Three Synthetic Repellents
ผู้แต่ง / หัวหน้าโครงการ (EN):	Boonyuan
บทคัดย่อ (EN):	Escape responses, knockdown (KD), and toxicity of laboratory strains of Anopheles minimus Theobald and Culex quinquefasciatus Say to three synthetic mosquito repellents, DEET (N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), IR3535, or picaridin, at 5% v/v concentrations, were evaluated using repellent-treated papers in standard WHO tube assays and an excito-repellency (ER) test chamber system. The tube assays recorded knockdown effects of each repellent immediately after 30-min exposure and the final morality following a 24-h holding period. DEET showed 100% KD at 30 min and complete toxicity at 24 h against both species. Both actions were either minimal or absent for IR3535 and picaridin, respectively. Culex quinquefasciatus showed significantly greater escape with DEET compared with the other compounds in both contact irritancy (excitation) and noncontact spatial repellency trials. Anopheles minimus showed much more pronounced irritancy and repellency flight escape to IR3535 than picaridin. DEET was the most active irritant and repellent compound against Cx. quinquefasciatus. When adjusting contact test responses based on paired noncontact repellency assays, DEET and IR3535 showed much stronger spatial repellent properties than irritancy with An. minimus. Picaridin performed poorly as an irritant or repellent against both species. We conclude that DEET, followed by IR3535, act as strong spatial repellents at 5% concentration. DEET also performs as a strong toxicant. Our findings show that different mosquitoes can respond contrastingly to repellents, thus the importance to test a wider range of species and populations to assess the full range of chemical action.
บทคัดย่อ:	ไม่พบข้อมูลจากหน่วยงานต้นทาง
ภาษา (EN):	en
เอกสารแนบ (EN):	http://nih.dmsc.moph.go.th/research/showimgdetil.php?id=515
เผยแพร่โดย (EN):	1 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 2 Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, Kasetsart University Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 3 Ministry of Public Health, National Institute of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand 4 Department of Pest Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5 Department of Plant Science and Agricultural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand 6 Division of Computer and Statistics, Faculty of Liberal Art and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaensean, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand 7 Public Health & Malaria Control Department, PT Freeport Indonesia, International SOS, Jl. Kertajasa Kuala Kencana, Papua 99920, Indonesia 8 Corresponding author, e-mail: faasthc@ku.ac.th
คำสำคัญ (EN):	DEET; IR3535; excito-repellency; mortality; picaridin
เจ้าของลิขสิทธิ์ (EN):	National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Science